Business Management Articles / Quality
Management
GLOBAL
COMPETITIVENESS THROUGH TOTAL QUALITY
by
Rene T. Domingo
There are new forces and drivers in the global
environment which create both opportunities
and problems for all business enterprises.
Perhaps we can reduce these forces into 4C's
- the changing customer, increasing competition,
the rising costs, and impeding crises. To
withstand these forces or 4C's, any company
should continuously improve and strengthen
itself. The next question is what to do next.
Lest we get bewitched, bothered, and bewildered
by these changes in the global environment,
and be overwhelmed by innumerable strategic
options, let us seek guidance from what I
consider one of the best but underrated management
books of all time: Alice's Adventures in Wonderland.
When Alice got lost in the forest, she met
a cat.
Alice:
"Would you tell me, please, which way
I ought to go from here?"
Cat:
"That depends a good deal on where you
want to get to."
Alice:
"I don't much care where --"
Cat:
"Then it doesn't matter which way you
go."
A company without a focus, without a vision,
will lose its way and self-destruct in the
midst of global opportunities and problems.
Problems will become crises, and opportunities
will be become problems. As somebody once
said "No opportunity is lost -- the other
fellow just takes it."
TQM
AS FOCUS
I believe that the only winning global strategy
is one based on Quality or Total Quality Management
(TQM). The Japanese have proven this time
and again. The survivors who will withstand
any global force now and in the future will
be companies whose focus or obsession is one
and only one: Quality. TQM puts the customer
on top of everything. Systems and strategies
of TQ companies are based on the unchanging
beliefs that "the customer is king and
the customer is always right." TQM also
guides them on which opportunity to grab and
which problems to solve first. TQ companies
have this constancy of purpose, regardless
of global trends and threats. Constancy of
purpose is the first quality commandment of
the late great quality guru, the patron saint
of Japanese businessmen: Dr. Edwards Deming.
. Big global companies that forget the customer
and quality are bound to fail from the very
beginning, and the experience is going to
be expensive if not fatal. And the bigger
they are, the harder they fall.
FAILURES
IN QUALITY
Sophisticated strategies based on costs, comparative
advantage, technology, economies of scale,
past experience, novel management concepts
and paradigms are bound to fail if the company
sells the wrong product or service to the
wrong customer. Global competitiveness starts
with quality competitiveness and ends with
quality competitiveness. We should become
quality competitive, before we strive to be
price competitive, cost competitive, or technologically
competitive. We have to strive for quality,
before we even strive for profits. If we concentrate
on quality, everything else follows : delighted
customers, lower cost, lower inventories,
motivated employees, higher sales and profits.
Not surprisingly, because of the substantial
cost of making mistakes in quality - called
quality cost - which on the average is 30%
of sales, TQ companies discover that by improving
quality, they can cut down cost dramatically.
With improved quality, even without any increase
in sales, companies have doubled or tripled
their profits.
AIRLINE
HUB-AND-SPOKE PARADIGM
The airline industry can also teach us a lesson
in quality management. Big American airlines
like United and Northwest which are losing
billions of dollars are now reassessing their
hub-and-spoke strategies which based on load
factor and economies of scale of the Jumbo
jet. Hub-and-spoke means passengers will have
more transits and stopovers just to get their
destination. It may be ideal for parcels,
but not for people. Passengers want convenience
and speed, not load factors; they believe
that the shortest distance between two points
is a straight line, not a spoke. So they are
flying the smaller but profitable Southwest
Airlines which caters to point-to-point passengers.
A major reason for the low market shares of
American cars in Japan is that they are of
the wrong size, and the steering wheel is
on the wrong side. The American carmakers
find it expensive to produce and modify cars
for the Japanese market. European car makers
are much more pragmatic and successful in
penetrating this tough market. Low cost and
advanced technology will not translate to
competitiveness and profitability if products
are of inferior quality and service is slow,
because there will be no sales.
GLOBAL
CONVERGENCE OF TASTES
As regional blocs remove economic boundaries
and tariff barriers, there will be only one
type of competition - global competition.
Even local companies selling locally will
have to compete globally with the onrush of
high quality and cheap imported goods from
neighboring nations. Dr. George Yip, author
of Total Global Strategy, cites increasing
travel, global advertising, and convergence
of lifestyle as strong drivers which increase
the demand for standardized products world
wide. The quality challenge is to have consistency
and sameness in all products and services
sold anywhere in the world; these require
rigid processes, systems, and training. It
is easy to do something right, but it is difficult
to it right all the time in all places. Standardization
is relatively easy with Coke which tastes
the same anywhere in the world since the syrup
comes only from one source. It is tougher
to do this with McDonalds hamburger since
raw materials and labor will have to be sourced
locally. Nevertheless, there are no surprises
and we are guaranteed that the Big Mac in
Moscow, Manhattan, or Manila should taste
the same. The bigger challenge is how to standardize
service. Euro-Disney is finding it difficult
for French employees to be as smilingly friendly
as their American counterparts.
Standardization and convergence of tastes
do not mean we are back in Henry Ford's days
when he said "The customer can have a
car with any color he wants, as long as it
is black." It is foolhardy to standardize
tastes, and design products and services based
on the average consumer. Competition and increase
in purchasing power can make consumers expect
more variety , more models from more and more
competing suppliers. Convergence of tastes
means consumers all over the world will want
to choose from the same set of products; but
they expect the set to consist of many types
and models from which they can choose their
own combination. This is what I call variety
within uniformity. The quality challenge here
is how to continuously innovate products and
come up with many models with small lots,
short lead time, and deliver them anywhere
in the world without excessive cost to the
customer. Flexible manufacturing systems and
just-in-time systems were designed to meet
this challenge.
TO
STANDARDIZE OR TO CUSTOMIZE?
By using only one rule - what the customer
wants - TQ companies easily decide whether
to standardize or customize products in one
country. For traditional companies, which
have many priorities and criteria, it may
be a complicated guessing game, or at most
a calculated risk, subject to fine tuning
or expensive correction later on. There are
no hard and fast rules. But there is only
one rule: the rule the customer makes and
follows. Whether a standardized or customized
product/service will sell depends on the customer,
not the company making it. The only strategy
that will work is one that can satisfy customer's
needs and quality expectations better than
the competitor. While there is such a thing
as global market, there is no such thing as
a global customer which wants a global product
with a global quality. For a particular product,
each customer in each country is a unique
situation. Success of a standard product in
the home market is not always a guarantee
of success in the global market.
ADAPTIVE
OR PROACTIVE
Some say the ability to adapt is a strength.
But to be adaptive or reactive in the global
market can be a very risky and expensive exercise
- because of the size of investment, distance,
and long lead times. Adaptation means you
have to modify products and processes after
learning painfully what customers really want.
Before P&G's Pampers became the best selling
disposable diaper in Japan, it learned an
expensive lesson and was almost driven out
of the Japanese market when it sold the unmodified
American diaper which was thick and bulky.
P&G realized much later that the Japanese
housewives change their baby's diaper twice
as often as the American housewives, and want
a slimmer and more compact diaper because
of limited space in the tiny Japanese houses.
TQ companies have learned to be proactive
and sensitive to customer needs, especially
in the ruthless and far-flung international
markets. They thoroughly study and anticipate
consumer needs before launching or exporting
their product - to satisfy their customer
right the first time. They design products
by thinking like the customer and with the
customer. Sony developed the highly successful
Walkman for the Japanese consumers by focusing
on the limited space in typical Japanese homes
which cannot accommodate large appliances.
The Walkman was also a hit in the U.S. Though
Americans have much bigger homes, the Walkman
appealed highly to their need for individual
privacy.
WORLD
CLASS MANUFACTURING
After quality is attained and assured, the
TQ company operating globally, dramatically
cuts its cycle times like product development
time, customer order processing time, manufacturing
lead time, set-up time. Cycle time reduction
greatly enhances product innovation, and product
delivery, and manufacturing flexibility --
thus increasing competitiveness. With the
rapid and unforeseeable changes in global
demand and tastes, short cycle times are a
great advantage, since you can adapt to changes
rapidly with minimum loss, minimum inventory,
and minimum obsolescence of products. You
do not have to depend on accurate forecasts
and a 20-20 vision of the future.
Traditional mass production systems are designed
to produce big batches of the same model,
because of economies of scale and long set-up
times. In a dynamic global environment, this
system is uncompetitive and can be fatal because
you may suddenly get stuck with very high
inventory of models and products customers
don't want anymore. Global competitiveness
can only be achieved by world class manufacturing
systems like flexible manufacturing systems
and Just-in-time systems which can produce
high variety of products with small lot sizes
and short changeover times.
In the Toyota factory in Japan, you can see
cars of different models and colors alternate
and flow in the same production line. The
just-in-time system has made Toyota the benchmark
of all other car companies in the world. In
Japan, the growing trend in some industries,
like metalworking, is to offer customers a
"minimum order of one piece" at
no extra charge. The assured formula for failure
in the export market is to have long lead
times, large minimum orders, with little or
no product variety. With short lead times
and set-up times, a lean and mean manufacturer
can satisfy even "unreasonable"
customers who frequently change their minds
and their orders with short notice. TQ companies
look at unreasonable customers as a gold mine,
since competitors do not want to serve them.
|